Tuesday, December 16, 2008

After rate cuts: The Fed's new ball game

After rate cuts: The Fed's new ball game

With rate cuts doing little to help boost the economy, the Fed has begun to print money to finance its liquidity programs. But that could spell disaster down the road.

By David Goldman, CNNMoney.com staff writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- After what is likely to be the last in a long series of interest rate cuts Tuesday, the Federal Reserve is expected to continue its new, perhaps more effective monetary strategy: printing lots of money.

The Fed traditionally uses its rate-cutting tool to encourage lending and boost the economy. But despite a staggering 4.25 percentage points of cuts since September 2007, the economy has not improved - in fact, it has gotten worse, drifting in to a recession last December.

Economists expect the Fed to produce one more cut to its benchmark funds rate at the conclusion of its Federal Open Market Committee meeting Tuesday, trimming the rate to 0.5%, the lowest level on record. Whether one last rate cut will help stimulate economic growth remains to be seen.

At any rate, the Fed will likely continue to use its new favorite tool, quantitative easing, "Fed-speak" for pouring new money into the economy.

In addition to lowering rates, the Fed has increased its lending to financial institutions and foreign central banks throughout the year to ease the credit crunch. But when the financial markets exploded into crisis-mode in mid-September, the Fed's reserve of Treasurys to support its lending began to run low. As a result, the central bank began firing up the printing presses, financing drastically increased lending to banks, purchases of corporate debt and bailouts of troubled institutions like AIG (AIG, Fortune 500).

As a result, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet has exploded since mid-September, more than doubling to $2.3 trillion from less than $1 trillion before Lehman Brothers' collapse ignited the lending crisis.

The huge increase in Fed lending has helped to ease credit, encouraging private institutions to lend on their own. Perhaps the best example of this trend can be seen in the commercial paper market, which is short-term corporate debt that companies sell to investors. That key market dried up after Lehman's bankruptcy, but the Fed was able to restore it to health by purchasing more than $300 billion of paper. Private investors have followed, outpacing the Fed's weekly purchases for three weeks in a row.

The Fed may look to quantitative easing as a way of boosting the housing market. By buying up 10-year Treasurys in large volume - essentially the government buying up its own long-term debt - the Fed could help to lower mortgage rates for prospective homebuyers.

Thirty-year fixed rate mortgages, which have historically moved in step with the 10-year note, currently hover around 5.5% despite 10-year Treasury yields of about 2.5%. Before the credit crunch, the rates were more typically within a range of 1.5 to 2 percentage points from one another. Economists say printing more money to help lower mortgage rates may get at the crux of the problem facing the economy.

"The combination of low home prices and low mortgage rates will make home affordability so much higher," said Bernard Baumohl, chief economist for the Economic Outlook Group. "Ultimately, housing is the epicenter that's holding back the banks and the economy from growing."

Buying up droves of Treasurys may also help encourage banks to lend, as government yields dip even lower into already historic lows. Gaining little return on those investments, banks may be forced to return to their traditional money-maker, issuing loans.

The downside: inflation

But there is a dark side to quantitative easing: inflation. The government has backed all of this new debt by selling Treasurys, which have been the golden asset of the credit crisis. They have been the only liquid security of late, reaching historic highs as their yields have hit all-time lows.

But there will come a time when the stock market bounces back and investors will no longer be satisfied with such low returns on their investments.

"Everybody and their brother knows this has to come down some time," said Kim Rupert, fixed income analyst with Action Economics. "It's tough to continue to buy Treasurys at these unsustainable levels."

That would mean huge amounts of government debt with little demand left to buy it, resulting in a devaluing of the dollar.

"The end result of all of this could be the next major problem: the crisis of confidence in the dollar," said Baumohl. "At some point, foreign investors are not going to come to the table to buy U.S. debt, leading to a dollar decline."

The dollar has held up very well throughout the credit crisis despite very low interest rates. But with countries like China and Middle Eastern countries with export-based economies facing a crisis of their own, those huge purchasers of U.S. government debt may start to ask for more return on their investment before they look elsewhere.

"That won't happen until about 2010," Baumohl said. "Right now, people are just so nervous about the credit markets, they'll continue to buy Treasurys even with rates at ridiculously low levels."

Bonds rise, rates fall

Treasurys continued to rise Monday as industrial production slid again, a sign that the economy will not rebound from the recession any time soon.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury was up 19/32 to 110 27/32 and its yield dipped to 2.51% from 2.57% from late Friday. Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.

The 30-year rose 2 5/32 to 130 9/32 and its yield dipped to 2.95% from 3.05%, dropping below 3% for the first time in its history.

The 2-year note rose 1/32 to 100 31/32 and its yield dipped to 0.75% from 0.77%.

The yield on the 3-month note was 0.02%, and has been hovering around 0% for days. Yields near the zero mark on short-term bills are an indication that investors are completely risk-averse, putting safety at a priority above profit.

The Treasury Department said its auction of $27 billion of 6-month notes Monday was well-received, with $73 billion in open interest. The median yield for the notes was 0.17%, and the yield traded at 0.2% later in the afternoon.

Meanwhile, lending rates between banks continued to sustain record low levels. The overnight Libor rate held 0.12%, and the 3-month Libor rate fell to 1.87% from 1.92% late Thursday, according to Bloomberg.com.

Libor, the London Interbank Offered Rate, is a daily average of what 16 different banks charge other banks to lend money in London, and is used to calculate adjustable-rate mortgages. More than $350 trillion in assets are tied to Libor.

Two market gauges showed confidence edging higher.

The "TED spread" narrowed to 1.85 percentage points from 1.89 percentage points Thursday. The TED spread measures the difference between the 3-month Libor and the 3-month Treasury bill, and is a key indicator of risk. The higher the spread, the more unwilling investors are to take risks.

Another indicator, the Libor-OIS spread, narrowed to 1.55 percentage points from 1.62 percentage points. The Libor-OIS spread measures how much cash is available for lending between banks, and is used for determining lending rates. The bigger the spread, the less cash is available for lending.

Monday, December 15, 2008






View all New York City events at Eventful

Saturday, December 13, 2008

quote

Alabastor LeSerpe > movies and games are the velvet upon which my marriage is acrylicly painted

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Fannie, Freddie execs turned aside warnings

Fannie, Freddie execs turned aside warnings
Dec 9, 11:58 AM (ET)

By ALAN ZIBEL

WASHINGTON (AP) - Top executives at mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ignored warnings that they were taking on too many risky loans long before the housing market plunged, according to documents released Tuesday by a House committee.

E-mails and other internal documents released by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee show that former Fannie CEO Daniel Mudd and former Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron disregarded recommendations that they stay away from riskier types of loans.

"Their own risk managers raised warning after warning about the dangers of investing heavily in the subprime and alternative mortgage market. But these warnings were ignored" by the two chief executives, said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the committee's chairman. "Their irresponsible decisions are now costing the taxpayers billions of dollars."

The two companies were seized by government regulators in September. A month later, Freddie Mac asked for an injection of $13.8 billion in government aid after posting a massive quarterly loss. Fannie Mae has yet to request any government aid but has warned it may need to do so soon.

Lawmakers questioned Mudd about an internal Fannie Mae presentation from June 2005 that showed the company at a "strategic crossroads," at which it could either delve into riskier loans or focus on more secure ones.

Questioned about the presentation, Mudd defended his company's effort to compete against Wall Street banks that were pouring money into subprime and other exotic loans.

"We couldn't afford to make the bet that the changes were not going to be permanent," Mudd said.

Mudd and three other former executives of the two companies defended their stewardship in a hearing held by the House committee.

"It's important to remember that Freddie and its sister institution, Fannie Mae, did not create the subprime market," said Richard Syron, Freddie Mac's former CEO.

But Rep. Darrell Issa, R. Calif., blasted Syron and Mudd, along with former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines, and former Freddie Mac CEO Leland Brendsel.

"All four of you seem to be in complete denial that Freddie and Fannie are in any way responsible for this. Your whole excuse for going to risky and unreasonable loans that are defaulting at an incredibly high rate is that everyone is doing it. If we don't do it, we'll be left out."

Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee around half the $11.5 trillion in U.S. outstanding home loan debt. The two companies are the engines behind a complex process of buying, bundling and selling mortgages as investments.

They traditionally backed the safest loans, 30-year fixed rate mortgages that required a down payment of at least 20 percent. But in recent years, they lowered their standards, matching a decline fueled by Wall Street banks that backed the now-defunct subprime lending industry.

Republicans blame Fannie and Freddie, and homeownership policies of the Clinton administration for sowing the seeds of the financial meltdown. Democrats defend the companies' role in encouraging homeownership and stress that Wall Street banks - not Fannie and Freddie - led the dramatic decline in lending standards.

For years the two companies flexed their lobbying muscle in Washington to thwart efforts to impose tighter regulation.

Internal Freddie Mac budget records obtained by The Associated Press show $11.7 million was paid to 52 outside lobbyists and consultants in 2006. Power brokers such as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato of New York were recruited with six-figure contracts.

The more difficult questions, however, will come next year, when lawmakers weigh what role, if any, the two companies play should play in the mortgage market.

Options include taking the companies private, morphing them into a public utility or a federal agency, or leaving them as government-sponsored entities that have private shareholders and profits, with tougher regulations.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

‘Big 3′ auto CEOs flew private jets to ask for taxpayer money

Posted: 04:19 PM ET

By Josh Levs
CNN
(CNN) — Some lawmakers lashed out at the CEOs of the “Big 3″ auto companies Wednesday for flying private jets to Washington to request taxpayer bailout money.

“There is a delicious irony in seeing private luxury jets flying into Washington, D.C., and people coming off of them with tin cups in their hand saying that they’re going to be trimming down and streamlining their businesses,” Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-New York, said to the CEOs of Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors at a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee. “It’s almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in high hat and tuxedo. It kind of makes you a little bit suspicious.”

He added, “Couldn’t you all have downgraded to first class or jet-pooled or something to get here? It would have at least sent a message that you do get it.”

Sunday, November 16, 2008

No bonus this year for Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein

No bonus this year for Goldman Sachs CEO Blankfein
Nov 16, 8:35 PM (ET)

By MADLEN READ

NEW YORK (AP) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein and six other top executives at the bank will not be receiving cash or stock bonuses for 2008, a spokesman said Sunday.

The decision was made by the seven executives themselves, said spokesman Lucas Van Praag, and approved Sunday by the Wall Street firm's compensation committee. The executives made the decision "because they think it's the right thing to do," Van Praag said.

The seven executives include Blankfein; Presidents and Co-Chief Operating Officers Jon Winkelried and Gary Cohn; Vice Chairmen John Weinberg, J. Michael Evans and Michael Sherwood; and Chief Financial Officer David Viniar.

They will receive no cash bonuses, no stock, and no options for 2008 - just their salaries, the spokesman said. Companies typically release compensation figures for top executives in the spring as part of their annual proxy statements.

Last year, Blankfein received total compensation of $54.0 million, according to calculations by The Associated Press - making him the 6th highest paid CEO at a Standard & Poor's 500 company in 2007. His salary that year was $600,000.

Goldman Sachs, like other financial institutions, has been struggling this year with the soaring mortgage defaults and the seize-up of the credit markets.

Goldman and Morgan Stanley were the only major U.S. investment banks left standing after the buyout of Bear Stearns Cos. by JPMorgan Chase & Co., the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co.'s sale to Bank of America Corp.

Shortly after Lehman's collapse, Goldman and Morgan Stanley became bank holding companies - a move that subjects them to more oversight from the Federal Reserve, but that also gives them permanent and wider access to the central bank's lending programs.

Goldman's shares closed Friday at $66.73, down $3.26, and are down 69 percent since the start of the year. The firm is in the midst of cutting about 3,200 employees, or about 10 percent, of its staff worldwide.

In Italia? Victoria detta condizioni

In Italia? Victoria detta condizioni

Adams paga 1000 euro ora di pattinaggio

Victoria Adams non si fida del marito, il calciatore David Beckham. Così, secondo il Metropolitan Post, intende seguirlo in Italia. Ma si sposterà solo a certe condizioni: un elicottero privato disponibile 24 ore su 24, per raggiungere David agli allenamenti, una piscina di 100 mq e una pista di pattinaggio sul ghiaccio per i suoi figli. La ex Spice è disposta a pagare più di mille euro all'ora per avere lezioni private da un campione mondiale.

La Posh Spice, temendo le voci sull'intensa vita mondana dei calciatori italiani e magari osservando le loro immagini sorridenti a fianco delle bellezze nostrane, avrebbe deciso di venire in Italia con il marito. Ma, per il suo "trasloco" avrebbe richiesto una serie di "servizi": elicottero privato disponibile 24 ore su 24, con frigobar all'interno, per raggiungere David durante gli allenamenti e spostarsi lungo la penisola senza dover ricorrere ai voli di linea. Una piscina di cento mq con zona termale e idromassaggio, un fitness center con beauty saloon, uno staff di coiffeur e l'hair stylist personale disponibili sette giorni su sette.

Secondo indiscrezioni di amici della coppia, Victoria avrebbe anche chiesto di far progettare una pista di pattinaggio sul ghiaccio per i suoi figli e sarebbe disposta a pagare più di mille euro all'ora per avere lezioni private da un campione mondiale. Si parla di Jeffrey Buttle, Evgeni Plushenko, Sasha Cohen e Carolina Kostner.

Il Los Angeles Times parla poi di una carta di credito illimitata chiesta dalla mondanissima Victoria per poter far spese nel quadrilatero della moda, che, durante le sue uscite, dovrebbe essere blindato con venti guardie del corpo per evitare code e imprevisti.

Victoria non si fida poi della cucina italiana e pretende uno chef esperto di macrobiotica affiancato da uno staff di cuochi giapponesi allievi di Jiro Ono, lo chef più anziano del mondo che lo scorso anno ha ricevuto tre stelle Michelin.

Friday, November 14, 2008

What should Congress do for U.S. automakers?

Quick Vote
What should Congress do for U.S. automakers?

a. Lend them money
b. Do nothing
c. Lend them money but kick out current execs

I say FIRE them! And take all those fat bonuses away from them!
Big bunch of incompetent idiots!
Do you think that after they get the $Bs they can turn things around? I think not...

"In recent months, General Motors has been burning through about $3.1 million an hour, or $52,000 - the price of a well-equipped Chevy Tahoe SUV - every minute."

Bailout Lacks Oversight Despite Billions Pledged

Bailout Lacks Oversight Despite Billions Pledged
Watchdog Panel Is Empty; Report Is Unfinished

By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 13, 2008; A01

In the six weeks since lawmakers approved the Treasury's massive bailout of financial firms, the government has poured money into the country's largest banks, recruited smaller banks into the program and repeatedly widened its scope to cover yet other types of businesses, from insurers to consumer lenders.

Rest of the article

Dr. Paul on the Global Financial Summitt

"I Got a Crush...On Obama" By Obama Girl

Friday, November 07, 2008

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Late to the Game: Microsoft Office Online

Friday, Oct. 31, 2008
Late to the Game: Microsoft Office Online
By Anita Hamilton
(From TIME online)

If you're one of the two million or so people who use the free, Web-based word processor or other apps from Google or Zoho, it may seem odd to you that Microsoft is still charging $500 for the full version of its desktop Office suite — and that hundreds of millions of people still pay for it. In fact, last year Microsoft brought in about $19 billion, or just under a third of its total revenue, from the business unit that sells Office. And increased sales of Office, in particular, are credited with helping the Redmond, Wash.-based firm beat analyst estimates for first-quarter earnings on Oct. 24.

Goldman Sachs analyst Susan Friar recently called Microsoft a "laggard" in moving to browser-based software. But, in reality, it's not even a player. Although Microsoft announced on Oct. 27 that it will roll out "lightweight" Web versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote as part of its next release of Office, that release isn't expected until 2010. Meanwhile, Zoho, which is based in Pleasanton, Calif. and has 500 employees, has been offering its free, Web-based word processor, Zoho Writer, since 2005. Google Docs, which is ad-supported, has been around since 2006.

"I think it's about time the Office suite is free," says Zoho's tech evangelist Raju Vegesna. "We paid $500 for an Office suite when the price of the hardware was $5,000. Now the price of the hardware has come down to $500, and it doesn't really make any sense for a piece of software to cost $500."

The main reason most people still use Microsoft Office, even though they don't really need it, is because it's all they know. Rather than risk the potential frustration of figuring out a new application, both companies and individuals continue to shell out for a bunch of familiar programs that, frankly, most of us barely scratch the surface of. (When was the last time, for example, you inserted a formula or recorded a macro in Word)?

To its credit, Microsoft has done a swell job of keeping us hooked with offers like a free 60-day trial and discounted versions of Office that sell for as low as $80 online. For most users, however, free Web apps are really all you need.

And they're getting better all the time. Zoho has spreadsheet, word-processing, presentation and organizing programs, and lets you work both online and off; it even has an iPhone app. Google Docs, which focuses on collaboration, lets you upload and edit existing Word and PowerPoint files, then chat in real time as you work on presentations and reports with colleagues. Because the applications reside on the Web, developers can quickly eliminate bugs and add bells and whistles, like the ability to insert headers, footers and pagination (all of which were recently added to Zoho Writer). The programs still feel simple to use, so you'll never feel overwhelmed, and you can edit worry-free, since auto-saving features ensure that you won't lose any work you haven't saved.

So here's what I suggest. Before you pay even the lowest price for Microsoft Office, give Zoho or Google Docs a try. They aren't confusing, and they won't make you feel stupid. To make absolutely sure, I became my own guinea pig. I typed this story in Zoho Writer, even though I had never even tried it until this week. So far, so good. Here's hoping my editor feels the same.

from YouTube

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Obama's prime-time ad skips over budget realities

Oct 29, 9:18 PM (ET)

By CALVIN WOODWARD

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was less than upfront in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.

Obama's assertion that "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond" the expense of his promises is accepted only by his partisans. His vow to save money by "eliminating programs that don't work" masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are - beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

A sampling of what voters heard in the ad, and what he didn't tell them:

THE SPIN: "That's why my health care plan includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions and lowers health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year."

THE FACTS: His plan does not lower premiums by $2,500, or any set amount. Obama hopes that by spending $50 billion over five years on electronic medical records and by improving access to proven disease management programs, among other steps, consumers will end up saving money. He uses an optimistic analysis to suggest cost reductions in national health care spending could amount to the equivalent of $2,500 for a family of four. Many economists are skeptical those savings can be achieved, but even if they are, it's not a certainty that every dollar would be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums.

---

THE SPIN: "I also believe every American has a right to affordable health care."

THE FACTS: That belief should not be confused with a guarantee of health coverage for all. He makes no such promise. Obama hinted as much in the ad when he said about the problem of the uninsured: "I want to start doing something about it." He would mandate coverage for children but not adults. His program is aimed at making insurance more affordable by offering the choice of government-subsidized coverage similar to that in a plan for federal employees and other steps, including requiring larger employers to share costs of insuring workers.

---

THE SPIN: "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond their cost."

THE FACTS: Independent analysts say both Obama and Republican John McCain would deepen the deficit. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Obama's policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years - and that analysis accepts the savings he claims from spending cuts. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, whose other findings have been quoted approvingly by the Obama campaign, says: "Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next 10 years." The analysis goes on to say: "Neither candidate's plan would significantly increase economic growth unless offset by spending cuts or tax increases that the campaigns have not specified."

---

THE SPIN: "Here's what I'll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year. Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee that they hire right here in the U.S. over the next two years and eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. Help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to pay their mortgages, by freezing foreclosures for 90 days. And just like after 9-11, we'll provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open. "

THE FACTS: His proposals - the tax cuts, the low-cost loans, the $15 billion a year he promises for alternative energy, and more - cost money, and the country could be facing a record $1 trillion deficit next year. Indeed, Obama recently acknowledged - although not in his commercial - that: "The next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals."

Friday, October 24, 2008

Monday, October 20, 2008

Flash's quirky 'two-second' bug still requires manual uninstall

Flash's quirky 'two-second' bug still requires manual uninstall
By Scott M. Fulton, III, BetaNews
October 20, 2008, 4:27 PM

How many times, the old Ronco TV spokesperson used to ask, has this happened to you? You're playing a Flash video in Firefox for Windows, and for a moment, you think it's actually going to start up.

You see the first two seconds of video, and you may even hear a little sound. And then nothing. You know the control still works because you see it's still pre-loading and caching content, but it just won't play.

BetaNews has noticed Flash's tendency to adopt this bizarre state for over two years; and with the latest refresh to Flash Player 10, we noticed it again. The cause, experts have said, is a set of System Registry settings that aren't in sync with one another, but what it is that got them "out of sync" is a mystery. And despite countless suggestions, we've discovered that few Registry tweaks seem to work for longer than the duration of the session; once we reboot, we're in trouble again.

If you find yourself in the same boat, then our recommendation for now is to use this uninstallation utility from Adobe, which is a command line tool that works specifically for Flash. This was released for other purposes, but we often find it necessary to uninstall and re-install Flash, and this seems to be the fastest way to go about it for now. Use the utility as directed, uninstall Flash, and then go back and reinstall it again.

This should result in a fully-working Flash, at least for the time being. We've seen some other suggestions, including this from Ars Technica which actually involves the use of the game music composition app Garage Band. Since that game does indeed use Flash, the fact that the game did lead to a solution for one user suggests that it's capable of tweaking that mystery set of Registry entries.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Friday, October 10, 2008

Friday, September 12, 2008

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Joy Bisco





Review: Google Chrome lacks polish under the hood

Sep 3, 12:26 AM (ET)

By PETER SVENSSON


NEW YORK (AP) - Google Inc. (GOOG) (GOOG)'s new Web browser, called Chrome, does much of what a browser needs to do these days: It presents a sleek appearance, groups pages into easy-to-manage "tabs" and offers several ways for people to control their Internet privacy settings.

Yet my initial tests reveal that this "beta," or preliminary release, falls short of Google's goals, and is outdone in an important measure by the latest version of Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) (MSFT)'s Internet Explorer.

Chrome is a challenge to Microsoft's browser, used by about three-quarters of Web surfers. But it could equally be called a challenge to Microsoft's Office software suite, because what Google really wants to do is to make the browser a stable and flexible platform that can do practically everything we want to do with a computer, from word processing and e-mail to photo editing.

To strengthen that effort, Chrome was designed to improve on the way other browsers handle JavaScript, one of the technologies used to make Web pages more interactive and more like desktop software applications. Google's online word processing and spreadsheet programs use this technology, but it's also very widely deployed on Web pages to do less sophisticated things, like drop-down menus.

At first blush, Google's focus on JavaScript makes sense. JavaScript can eat up computer processor power, and if poorly used by a Web site, can bring down the browser. One of the things Chrome promises is that if one browser tab crashes, it won't take down the whole program.

Chrome also has some cosmetic differences from Internet Explorer and Firefox, like putting the tabs at the very top of the window. That's a nice move, but it's the browser's performance that really matters to me. And this is where Chrome's attention to JavaScript might miss the point.

At work, I often have 40 or 50 tabs open in Firefox, grouped in different windows depending on which topic they pertain to. Frequently, Firefox would slow down all the other applications on my computer, then seize up completely.

At first I thought JavaScript was to blame, and blocked it from running. But that made many sites unusable, and it didn't help: The browser still froze.

It turns out the culprit is not JavaScript but another technology used to make Web pages more interactive: Adobe Systems Inc. (ADBE)'s Flash plug-in. It's the program-within-a-program that plays YouTube videos and those annoying "splash" pages that some sites employ to dazzle you with animations before letting you do anything useful on the site.

Flash is a tremendous resource hog in Firefox, eating up processor time to the point where there is nothing left for other programs. It does this even if you're not actively doing anything. Merely having a YouTube page open on your screen will suck power from your computer's central processing unit, or CPU. This is outrageous behavior for a browser. It's my CPU and I want it back.

Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient browser.

What does this mean on Chrome? Well, it has the same problem. It lets sites running Flash take over your computer's resources. It doesn't hog the CPU quite as bad as with Firefox, but in a way, it's more serious, because unlike with Firefox, there's no way to stop Flash from running. Chrome's controls are quite bare-bones, perhaps because it's still in "beta."

On the plus side, Chrome allows you to diagnose problems with runaway plug-ins easily, because it tells you exactly which pages are consuming which resources. Had I been able to do this with Firefox, it would have saved me from months of browser troubles.

So which one comes out smelling like roses? The beta of Internet Explorer 8, released just last week.

When playing a YouTube video, Firefox 3 took up 95 percent of the CPU time on a three-year old laptop running Windows XP.

Chrome came in at 60 percent - still too much. Especially since Google owns YouTube! You'd think it could make its browser work well with that site in particular.

Internet Explorer barely broke a sweat, taking up just a few percent.

When I told each browser to load eight pages, some of which were heavy with Flash and graphics, Firefox took 17 seconds and ended with a continuous CPU load of 50 percent. That means it took up half of my available processing power, even if I wasn't looking at any of the pages.

Chrome loaded them the fastest, at 12 seconds, and ended with a CPU load of about 40 percent.

Internet Explorer 8 took 13 seconds to load, but ended with no CPU load at all.

So while Chrome's performance is a little better than that of Firefox, in practical terms, it is far less useful, because it lacks the broad array of third-party add-ons programs like Flashblock that make Firefox so customizable. With time, it might catch up, but in the meantime, I'd recommend giving the new Internet Explorer a spin.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Monday, August 25, 2008

Beijing Olympics' winners and losers

Beijing Olympics’ winners and losers
By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports
Aug 24, 9:44 am EDT


BEIJING – After nearly 1,000 medals were handed out here, someone needed to provide a Cliffs Notes version on the real winners (and losers) of the 2008 Summer Olympics. We’re here to oblige, and yes, readers from around the world, this is an American-centric list. Deal with it.

WINNER – Michael Phelps


With eight gold medals, seven world records, a possible $100 million in endorsements – and reports he’s hanging out with Australian swimmer Stephanie Rice – Phelps has redefined Olympic success.

Perhaps most impressive, he made Americans care about swimming. His race was appointment television at night and coffee-shop talk in the morning. The likelihood the Baltimore native achieves the goal of making swimming “more than a once-every-four-year sport” remains a long shot, although who wants to bet against him now?

LOSER – NBC

Because I was in China, I didn’t watch NBC’s coverage. I can only say from the flood of angry emails it hasn’t improved since the last time I was home for the games. Tape-delayed races, plausibly live coverage and covering up Chinese special effects for the Opening Ceremony, NBC is like the China Daily – a state-run propaganda newspaper – of American television.

If only everyone could get the feed for the Canadian Broadcast Company, which anyone in select American markets can attest does an exponentially better job of television coverage of the Olympics.

WINNER – Kobe Bryant

The two biggest surprises to come out of the redemption men’s basketball team was 1) the ease in which the U.S. dominated the competition to win gold and 2) the immense popularity of Kobe in China. Everywhere he went, he found adoring crowds, huge ovations and general rock-star treatment that not only dwarfed his teammates but also was at least the equal of national hero Yao Ming.

Not even in Los Angeles is Bryant this well received. Said Carmelo Anthony: “He ought to move here.”

LOSER – Liu Xiang

The Chinese hero was under enormous pressure to repeat gold in the 110-meter hurdles, an event he no longer dominates. He never even competed, pulling out due to injury before the preliminaries in an announcement that caused television reporters to cry on the air.

It was a devastating turn for Liu, whose likeness adorns advertisements across the country. While sympathetic Chinese journalists felt for Liu’s injury, many skeptical western ones questioned if it was just a face-saving measure. While only Liu knows for sure, it’s one of those clear cultural divisions in the world. Either way, the Olympics of Liu’s dreams turned into a nightmare.

WINNER – Hope Solo

A year ago, after she was benched in a Women’s World Cup game against Brazil, the U.S. goalkeeper ripped the decision, a move that tore apart her team and caused her temporarily to be separated from it. At the Olympics, she let her play do the talking, making a number of critical saves in a shutout of Brazil for the gold medal.

The entire U.S. women’s soccer team looked like it had entered a new era under positive coach Pia Sundhage. Solo is just the most obvious example.

LOSER – Ronaldinho

Soccer fans here were excited by the inclusion of the veteran superstar on the Brazilian men’s team, which, per Olympic rules, is mostly under 23. Once considered the best player in the world, Ronaldinho showed just how out of shape he is and looked a shell of his former self in a sad vision of how far and fast he has fallen. Very disappointing.

WINNER – Alicia Sacramone

Yes, she famously fell off the beam in the women’s gymnastics team finals and failed to medal in her only individual event final, the vault. She wasn’t too happy leaving Beijing.

However, the 20-year-old Brown University sophomore may wind up one of the breakout stars of the games. Even more than gold medalist teammates Nastia Liukin and Shawn Johnson. At least among male fans who help make her one of the most searched athletes of the Olympics.

Or as Deadspin.com put it: “Is Alicia Sacramone the New Anna Kournikova?”

Anna never won, either. She made a lot of money anyway.

LOSER – Softball

In losing the gold to Japan, the U.S. may have made the best case for softball to be saved from elimination from future Olympics. That’s an awfully big price to pay for something that may not even be enough.

WINNER – Usain Bolt

Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt became the first man since Carl Lewis in 1984 to sweep the 100 and 200 gold medals at an Olympics.

Track seemed all but dead a couple weeks ago. Then along came this flamboyant speedster out of Jamaica.

He won three gold medals and set three world records, all while electrifying fans around the globe. He wasn’t just fast; he was flashy, a personality, a 6-foot-5 game changer who simply gobbled up track with each stride.

There hadn’t been anything in track like him in years, and coming off an era of extreme doping, he couldn’t have come at a better time.

LOSER – Jacques Rogge

If you wonder why everyone calls the International Olympic Committee out of touch, consider that while most of the world was celebrating Bolt, the organization’s president decided he should use his considerable bully pulpit to rip him for supposed showboating.

Rogge is a classic stiff-collared bureaucrat. His organization has made billions off athletes such as Bolt for years, yet he has to find someone to pick on.

He’s deathly frightened of criticizing any major nation – such as China, which broke a hundred promises to him in staging these games. He wouldn’t dare mention any of the dozens of athletes from big countries whose celebrations were just as bold.

A single sprinter from a small, impoverished, powerless island nation? Sure, hammer away.

Fortunately, Bolt came back and didn’t change his act at all in winning his third gold in the 4x100 relay. Rogge will soon fade into obscurity for a while.

LOSER – Smog


Smog was thick around the Bird’s Nest during the Beijing Games.

In a beat down worse than the one the U.S. laid on Germany in men’s hoops, the Chinese government all but eliminated smog from Beijing during the games. Trees were planted, factories shuttered, construction sites quieted and cars removed from the streets in an effort to produce blue skies.

It was a slow start to the process. Early on, the clouds of pollution were almost incomprehensible. The Chinese originally tried to claim it wasn’t smog but that it was just “mist.” Only the China Daily, and perhaps NBC, would believe this.

“We got absolutely snuffed out,” said a spokesperson for the Smog Olympic Committee. “It was a tough games for us. We just couldn’t get the carbons together to form a cancerous cloud, trap heat and sear eyeballs.”

WINNER – Smog

Guess what, it’s coming back. How depressing will it be to a Beijing resident the next couple of weeks? The smoke stacks will be relit, the coal plants fired up, the cars will return. Slowly, the reverse of the above picture will occur.

One older Beijing resident claimed the city hadn’t looked this good in a decade. Newer arrivals remarked the town was actually pretty. Yeah, not for long.

China has claimed it will curb the problem, but how? And Western corporations, all too pleased to take advantage of lax environmental laws, are part of the problem, too.

China gets routinely and deservedly hammered for its human rights issues in Tibet and Darfur. The biggest human rights issue may be the cancer in the air that its own citizens must breathe.

WINNERS – USA Volleyball and USA Water Polo


Kerri Walsh and Misty May-Treanor won their second consecutive gold medal in beach volleyball.

On the beach, the Americans swept the men’s and women’s competitions. Indoor, the men won gold and the women won silver. Both did so while dealing with some level of tragedy from the stabbings of Todd and Barbara Bachman, the parents of former women’s player Elisabeth Bachman and the in-laws of men’s coach Hugh McCutcheon.

In the pool, the men surprisingly took silver and the women also won silver in a last-second loss.

WINNER – Cigarette smoke

Veteran readers of this column will note past criticism of Greek and Italian smokers, two medal contenders in the worldwide tobacco competition. At dinner, the Greeks smoke between bites. The Italians just never take it out of their mouths. (Smoking would be one of the more intriguing Summer Games events, although not as good as Russian Roulette, where gold really is the only option. Then there’s haggling at the Beijing silk market, where I’d have a shot to medal.)

Anyway, the Chinese appear to be far behind on cigarettes. It was mostly clean breathing (so to speak) around here.

LOSER – Chinese coffee

Good tea here. Coffee, not so much. I’m dying for a Dunkin’ Donuts large black. Not four ounces of warm, darkened water. The Big One.

WINNER – Ara Abrahamian


Yes, sportsmanship and all declares that protesting a scoring decision by throwing your bronze medal down and storming off isn’t good form. Then again, who hasn’t wished they could do the same on occasion. The Swedish Greco-Roman wrestler inspired every take-this-job-and-shove-it wannabe around the world.

That’s a winner enough for us. And that was before an arbitration court ruled in his favor.

LOSER – Angel Matos

The Cuban taekwondo athlete was so angered at his disqualification from a bronze medal match, he deliberately booted the referee in the face. Yeah, that’s a little much. Matos and his coach were banned for life. Not sure how there could be an appeal.

WINNER – Beijing organization

Considering the ability of the government to relocate people, build whatever infrastructure was necessary and control everything from private industry to dinner menus to traffic, there will probably never be a better tactically run games than these.

As long as you didn’t consider how it got done, working in Beijing was a breeze. The venues were modern and close, and the organization was sophisticated and smart. On this point, London and everyone else has its work cut out for it.

WINNER – Living in Beijing

Once the smog cleared, Beijing was tremendous. One of the best parts of covering an Olympics is you don’t see the host city as a tourist. You come here to live and work for a month, and while you’re obviously never a real local, you tend to get a little deeper into the place.

You learn how the subway works. You figure out a bus route. You have regular restaurants. We lived at Beijing Normal University, on the near northwest side of town, between Second and Third Ring Roads. It is surrounded by a real neighborhood, and over the course of nearly a month we met store owners, waiters, bartenders, cooks, security guards and local residents. We’d see them on the street and stop and chat.

The food was incredible and beyond cheap. The service was impeccable. And this neighborhood near “Bay-Shoe-Dah” was a tremendous place to live for a stretch.

WINNER – Chinese People

Nowhere in the world have I encountered friendlier people. Nowhere. Perhaps it was Olympic pride. Perhaps I was just an easily identifiable American with a press badge. It didn’t matter. The Chinese people wanted me to think well of them and their emerging country, and it is quite clear that this nation’s greatest resource is its citizens.

From the woman in the earthquake refugee camp who, despite having nothing, offered me a small, simple glass of water as a sign of hospitality. To the army of volunteers, forever smiling even when given the lowest of tasks such as sorting garbage in the cafeteria. The lasting memory for me from these games will be the Chinese people.

Their government has issues (as do all governments). It didn’t live up to what it said it would here. There is a great fear of China in the western world because people here will work for wages unlivable anywhere else and because of a natural suspicion of the Communist party.

No doubt, the challenges here are immense. If allowed, the Chinese people might be good enough to solve them.

Friday, August 22, 2008

Yimou: "Diritti umani? Inutili"

Occidente soffre di troppa democrazia"

I diritti umani? Rendono l'Occidente inefficiente e non gli consentono di raggiungere gli elevati standard organizzativi e artistici di cui sono capaci i cinesi. Parola di Zhang Yimou, autore di pellicole famosissime come "Lanterne rosse" e "Hero", oltreché regista della cerimonia di apertura delle Olimpiadi di Pechino. Secondo lui, solo con il senso dell'ordine e l'ubbidienza si possono realizzare elevate prestazioni artistiche.

Le incredibili affermazioni sono state fatte nel corso di un'intervista al quotidiano cinese "Weekend al sud". Zhang Yimou ha espresso la sua incondizionata ammirazione per le manifestazioni politico-culturali dei nordcoreani e spiega che "questo tipo di uniformità produce bellezza", di cui "siamo capaci anche noi cinesi". Per esemplificare il suo pensiero il regista cita la scena ammirata in tutto il mondo della cerimonia di apertura, in cui sul terreno dello stadio blocchi argentei con i caratteri di stampa cinesi si sollevavano ed abbassavano come in una macchina da scrivere, risultato ottenibile solo perché "gli esecutori obbediscono agli ordini e sono in grado di farlo come un computer, è questo lo spirito cinese".

Insomma, obbedienza e cieca e nessuno spazio al libero arbitrio delle persone. Cosa che non riuscirebbe così bene agli occidentali, troppo abituati a quella strana cosa chiamata "libertà". Gli occidentali "non sono in grado" di fare lo stesso, non fosse altro che per "il loro rispetto dei diritti umani" dice Yimou. Il regista spiega che proprio le rigide norme sul lavoro e la tutela sindacale incontrate nei Paesi europei gli hanno finora impedito di realizzare regie operistiche, poiché "gli interpreti occidentali lavorano solo quattro giorni e mezzo alla settimana, fanno due pause al giorno per il caffé, ma poi non sono nemmeno in grado di stare bene allineati". Come se non bastasse, attori e cantanti occidentali "hanno anche a disposizione organizzazioni di ogni tipo e i sindacati". Secondo il regista, grazie alla loro cultura "i cinesi riescono a realizzare in una settimana quello che gli europei fanno in un mese". La Cina è davvero vicina?

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Liu Xiang, dolore e rabbia

Liu Xiang, dolore e rabbia. E se fosse tutta una farsa?

L'eroe nazionale non poteva perdere. E il video prima della gara sarebbe stato girato per ottenere i 13 milioni dell'assicurazione


PECHINO, 19 agosto 2008 - Una conferenza stampa organizzata in pochi minuti (mai accaduto in Cina); il capo dell’atletica cinese, Feng Shuyong, notoriamente scarso in lingua inglese, che miracolosamente comincia a parlarla benissimo e a usare termini scientifici; un telegramma (anche questo mai accaduto prima) del vicepresidente della Repubblica popolare, Xi Jinping, al Ministero dello sport, per definire Liu Xiang "Un eroe", appena 5 minuti dopo l’infortunio (nemmeno per la ginnasta Sang Lan, rimasta paralizzata nel ’98 era stato fatto altrettanto); una frase non tradotta, un video non trasmesso in Cina. E il dramma di un nazione e di un popolo rischia di diventare uno scherzo cinese, il meno divertente, il più sconcertante e irritante.

I DUBBI - Quando è annunciata la conferenza stampa, subito dopo il ritiro di Liu Xiang, per i giornalisti stranieri è tutto normale. Per quelli cinesi, invece, è incredibile. E quando sentono Feng Shuyong spiegare con termini tecnici l’infortunio si guardano tra loro, straniti, perché la sensazione è di una lezione imparata a memoria, in ottimo inglese. E cominciano i dubbi, che aumentano quando Sun Haiping, l’allenatore personale di Liu Xiang, dice che tre medici hanno tentato di farlo guarire, ma che "Persino il ghiaccio e le preghiere non sono serviti". La frase non è tradotta per gli stranieri. Le preghiere? Tre medici che pregano? Molti giornalisti cinesi non credono più a una parola. La conferenza stampa, sospettano, è stata preparata in precedenza. I tecnici si sono accorti che Liu Xiang non ha recuperato dall’infortunio e se ne sono inventati uno nuovo. La sconfitta in pista sarebbe intollerabile, meglio far cadere l’eroe nazionale sotto un destino avverso.

I SOLDI - E si pensa che anche il video girato prima della gara, e non mandato in onda in Cina, abbia due scopi: dimostrare che Liu Xiang ha avuto un nuovo infortunio e costituire una conferma per l’assicurazione, che dovrà dare 13 milioni di dollari. Il paradosso è che Liu Xiang "rischia" di avere un vantaggio economico da questa storia. Ci sono diverse stime di quanto guadagni, secondo la rivista Forbes 16 milioni di euro l’anno, ma una più realistica dovrebbe essere sui 10 milioni di euro, garantiti da Nike, Coca Cola, Shanshan (abbigliamento), Konka (produzioni Tv), Baisha (sigarette), China mobile (telefonia), Wili (latte) e Longxin (moto). L’agente di Liu Xiang non tratta mai per meno di un milione di euro. Ma ora, con la fama di "eroe" che si è inchinato solo a un dolore insopportabile, dopo aver comunque tentato di andare in pista "per amore del popolo", le cifre potrebbero aumentare. Lo scherzo cinese funziona così.

Monday, August 18, 2008

Time Magazine article: "Making an Arguement for Misspelling"

Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2008
Making an Arguement for Misspelling
By Laura Fitzpatrick

Most teachers expect to correct their students' spelling mistakes once in a while. But Ken Smith has had enough. The senior lecturer in criminology at Bucks New University in Buckinghamshire, England, sees so many misspellings in papers submitted by first-year students that he says we'd be better off letting the perpetrators off the hook and doing away with certain spelling rules altogether.

Good spellers, Smith says, should be able to go on writing as usual; those who find the current rules of English too hard to learn should have their spelling labeled variant, not wrong. Smith zeroes in on 10 candidates for variant spellings, culled from his students' most commonly misspelled (or mispelled, as Smith suggests) words. Among them are Febuary instead of February, twelth instead of twelfth and truely instead of truly — all words, he says, that involve confusion over silent letters. When students would ask why there's no e in truly, Smith didn't really have an answer. "I'd say, 'Well, I don't know. ... You've just got to drop it because people do,' " he says. Smith adds that when teachers correct spelling, they waste valuable time they could be spending on bigger ideas.

Word nerds aren't the only ones with a stake in the proposal. People who have trouble with spelling are punished when it comes to applying for jobs or even filling out forms, even though their mistakes are far from unusual, says Jack Bovill, chairman of the British-based Spelling Society, an international organization that has advocated simplified spellings since 1908. A 2007 Spelling Society survey of 1,000 British adults found that more than half could not spell embarrassed or millennium correctly and more than a quarter struggled with definitely, accidentally and separate.

Smith and Bovill are part of a long and illustrious line of spelling malcontents. Benjamin Franklin, Andrew Carnegie, Teddy Roosevelt and even Noah Webster, father of American lexicography, all lobbied for spelling reform, their reasons ranging from traumatic childhood spelling experiences to the hope that easier communication would promote peace. In 1906, Mark Twain lobbied the Associated Press to use phonetic spelling. "The heart of our trouble is with our foolish alphabet," he once wrote. "It doesn't know how to spell, and can't be taught."

Non-English-speaking countries have been simplifying their spelling for centuries: Spain, France, Germany, Russia, Norway, Ireland, Indonesia and Japan, among others, have all instituted such reforms; Portugal in May amended its spelling to follow the simpler Brazilian rules. Since 1755, when the English language was standardized in Samuel Johnson's aptly named Dictionary of the English Language, many variant spellings have become widely accepted on both sides of the pond. In 1864, for instance, the U.S. government officially changed the spelling of words like centre and timbre to end in the variant -er; more recently, at the beginning of the 20th century, fantasy became an accepted variant of phantasy.

But some language purists insist that there is value to the top-down rules of English. "People who spell a lot of words incorrectly either aren't paying attention or don't care," says Barbara Wallraff, who writes the Wordcourt column on language and writing problems for the Atlantic and King Features Syndicate. "Why are we changing our language to accommodate — with two m's — them?"

Joe Pickett, executive editor of the American Heritage Dictionary, says that changes to dictionary entries are always on the table, but he and his seven fellow editors are a tough crowd. They keep an eye on print publications to see whether a variant usage has started to become mainstream. Any word that seems to be a good candidate for an update undergoes rigorous scrutiny as the editors seek input from a panel of some 200 orthographic and lexicographic whizzes. Even among this writerly crowd, 13% admitted in 1996 to combining a lot into a single word. But 93% still considered it an error and corrected it in their own writing — leading the editors not to change the entry. Variants are added to the dictionary, Pickett says, "only when we're really convinced that even people like us don't notice [the misspelling] much."

Smith, for his part, insists that he is advocating only for minor changes. "I'm not saying to people who have actually gone to all the trouble to learn all the exceptions to the rule that they should unlearn it. I'm just saying, let's have a few more variant spellings," he says. And if that doesn't catch on, he has another idea. "In the 21st century, why learn by heart rote spelling when you can just type it into a computer and spell-check?" he asks.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Schiaffo a Berlusconi dalla NBC «È troppo anziano per andare a Pechino»

Toni da sfottò dei presentatori della tv Usa durante la cerimonia dei giochi

Non sono stati risparmiati neanche gli atleti italiani: mostrati per pochi secondi come quelli del Mali e Gabon

NEW YORK – Italia che conta poco, Italia da barzelletta. E’ questa l’immagine che milioni di americani hanno ricevuto venerdì sera nel guardare la cerimonia d'apertura dei Giochi di Pechino, trasmessa durante il prime time, - con una differita di ben 12 ore - dalla NBC. Che ha sborsato 894 milioni di dollari per ottenere i diritti in esclusiva per gli Stati Uniti. Quando, verso la fine dello show, i riflettori sono toccati all’Italia, il tono dei due presentatori Bob Costas e Matt Lauer è passato dal serio al faceto. «Il primo ministro italiano Silvio Berlusconi ha rinunciato ad essere qui stasera insieme agli oltre 80 capi di stato», hanno spiegato ridacchiando i due mezzibusti della NBC, «Perché a Pechino fa caldo. Troppo caldo per lui». Dopo aver ironizzato sull’immensa fortuna di Berlusconi («il più ricco magnate italiano dei media che è anche primo ministro del Paese»), e sulla sua età («a 72 anni è troppo anziano per un viaggio del genere»), i due presentatori hanno concluso spiegando ai telespettatori che «se sei ricco e potente come lui, puoi permetterti di startene a casa a guardare la cerimonia. Comodamente seduto davanti alla tv».

Il tono da sfottò nei confronti del leader italiano era in netto contrasto con quello, serio e rispettoso, riservato agli altri leader presenti sul palco dei Vip – dal presidente francese Sarkozy a quello americano George W. Bush. Ma lo schiaffo in faccia all’Italia non ha risparmiato neppure gli atleti italiani, che sono stati mostrati per pochi secondi, alla stregua delle mini-delegazioni di paesi in via di sviluppo come Mali e Gabon, e al contrario di quelle di altri paesi europei quali Spagna, Germania, Inghilterra e Francia, cui Lauer e Costas hanno dedicato dettagliati ritratti, in elogio ai passati record dei loro atleti. Perché questo doppio binario? Perché umiliare così l’Italia? Che cosa hanno pensato milioni di italo-americani che hanno seguito la cerimonia da casa? Non è la prima volta che la NBC finisce nel mirino durante l’olimpiade. Due anni fa il network era stato criticato dal quotidiano Usa Today perché, durante le dirette da Torino per le Olimpiadi invernali, si era rifiutato di menzionare la storia della Sacra Sindone, finita su tutti i giornali Usa. «Vogliamo tenere la religione fuori dai giochi», si era giustificato allora un portavoce.

NBC withholding live Olympic events from west coast viewers

By Chris Chase

NBC went to a lot of trouble in order to get major Olympic events like swimming and gymnastics on the air live in primetime in the United States. Now, after getting their wish, the Peacock Network is inexplicably showing those events on tape delay on the west coast.

Because the time difference from Beijing to the United States wouldn't allow NBC to air live coverage of events from China, swimming and gymnastics finals were moved to the morning in Beijing. The network paid $894 million to broadcast these Olympics and didn't want a redo of 2000, when every major event in Sydney was shown on tape delay (it's no coincidence that the ratings for those Games were the lowest in history).

But after enduring months of tough negotiations with the IOC to get the events moved, NBC is doing exactly what they tried to avoid: showing events on tape. Tonight's swimming finals with Michael Phelps, Dara Torres and Katie Hoff were not shown live in the Mountain or Pacific time zones, nor will they be shown for the entirety of the competition. NBC will instead ran the east coast feed three hours later; at 8:00 p.m. PT. So, at the moment (midnight on the east coast), viewers on the other side of the country still haven't seen Phelps shatter his own world record in the 400-meter individual medley.

This is a baffling decision by NBC. It's hard to recall any other time when a sporting event has been shown live in one half of the country, but not the other. It's unheard of. Sure, some sporting events start at weird times on the west coast, but that's the norm and people adapt. Like earthquakes, wildfires and actors-turned-governors, it's just how things are. That's why bars have breakfast buffets and bloody mary bars during football season for 10:00 a.m. kickoffs. If live mid-day weekend telecasts are good enough for the NFL and college football, why not the Olympics?

If the network plans on continuing the delay of the west coast feed, they're subjecting themselves to viewer backlash, poor ratings and upset advertisers. Essentially, NBC strong-armed the IOC into changing around a bulk of the Olympic schedule in order to broadcast live events in two time zones. Great business decision, guys. Why not just push Jay Leno out the door too while you're at it. (Oh, wait.)

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

TV ads

香港禁播的廣告


辦公室偷情

Monday, July 28, 2008

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Monday, July 07, 2008

Revo Uninstaller

Revo Uninstaller helps you to uninstall and remove unwanted programs installed on your computer even if you have problems uninstalling and cannot uninstall them from "Windows Add or Remove Programs" control panel applet.

Revo Uninstaller is a much faster and more powerful alternative to "Windows Add or Remove Programs" applet!

With its advanced and fast algorithm, Revo Uninstaller analyzes an application's data before uninstall and scans after you uninstall an application. After the program's regular uninstaller runs, you can remove additional unnecessary files, folders and registry keys that are usually left over on your computer. Even if you have a broken installation, Revo Uninstaller scans for an application's data on your hard disk drives and in the Windows registry and shows all found files, folders and registry keys so you can delete them.

With its unique "Hunter mode", Revo Uninstaller offers you some simple, easy to use, but effective and powerful approaches to manage (uninstall, stop, delete, disable from auto starting) and to get information about your installed and/or running programs.

The Breakfast Club

NELLY - HOT IN HERE

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Disney creates Google Earth map of Disney World

Jun 5, 2:19 PM (ET)

BURBANK, Calif. (AP) - Tourists overwhelmed by the mind-boggling size of Walt Disney World in Orlando, Fla., will now be able to plan their tour with the help of a 3D Google Earth map created by The Walt Disney Co.

The map of the four theme parks and 22 hotels at Disney World shows souvenir shacks, merry-go-round horses and even benches for resting.

Google Earth, an interactive 3D mapping program, allows to create travelogues by embedding photos, videos and commentary about locations they highlight.

Disney called its entry the largest corporate initiative on Google Earth.

About 100,000 shots from eight photographers went into 1,500 three-dimensional images of a variety of structures at Disney World, the company said Thursday.

Disney's Google Earth entry also contains links to blogs and YouTube videos and information on everything from the minimum rider height for certain attractions to menus at different restaurants.

Nearly nine in 10 park guests plan their vacations online, Disney said.

"Guests and travel planners can now explore our world with just a few clicks of a mouse, and they can book vacations while being immersed in what the destination has to offer," resorts Chairman Jay Rasulo said in a statement.


Sunday, June 01, 2008

Thursday, May 15, 2008